Hi. Some retirement villages are quite extensive. Like this one [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068265700) [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075341081) -> [website](https://nazarethcare.co.za/nazareth-house-cape-town/). [frail_care](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510615), [assisted living](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510600), [dementia facilites](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510603) plus an [independent residential area with duplex apartments](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510985) (the last is not completely captured). Is the practice to group these under one social facility with a short desciption at the actual location (like the examples above) or tag each location as an amenity-> like here [(a dedicated facility for clergy)](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230100564) ---but falling within the boundary of the main social_facility? The former (first) seems more appropriate than the latter (last). Making sure and need confirmation please.

Hi. Some retirement villages are quite extensive. Like this one [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068265700) -> [website](https://nazarethcare.co.za/nazareth-house-cape-town/). [frail_care](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510615), [assisted living](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510600), [dementia facilites](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510603) plus an [independent residential area with duplex apartments](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134510985) (the last is not completely captured). Is the practice to group these under one social facility with a short desciption at the actual location (like the examples above) or tag each location as an amenity-> like here [(a dedicated facility for clergy)](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230100564) ---but falling within the boundary of the main social_facility? The former (first) seems more appropriate than the latter (last). Making sure and need confirmation please.