![alt text][1] [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142476484#map=17/52.99205/-0.04871][2] So here is a managed forest area (which wasn't created by me, FYI). Technically, this isn't wrong as this whole area is owned by Boston Woods Trust and they've named it "Beech Wood". Only parts of it are actually managed forest though. It's built like a park, with exercising spots, benches and tables, etc. Most importantly, it's got grassy areas, meadows, and some scrub/heath. However, I can't just map meadows on top of the wood, kind of like I tried on the right there. They just overlap and the tree icons are still displayed on top of the meadow, when there aren't actually trees there. I'd really like it if there was a tag such as [leisure=nature_reserve][2] [leisure=nature_reserve][3] for areas like this. That way the whole area wouldn't just be represented as a wood, and you'd be able to map smaller areas within it, like you do with national parks and nature reserves. What's the alternative? Should I map each separate wood area, and then merge the polygons and name it as "Beech Wood"? Should the meadow polygons also be merged since they're part of the park/wood/area? Or did I just make a needlessly long thread about what is clearly a nature reserve? Even though I've not seen it categorised as such anywhere? [1]: https://i.imgur.com/O09rhVq.png [2]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142476484#map=17/52.99205/-0.04871 [3]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve

![alt text][1] So here is a managed forest area (which wasn't created by me, FYI). Technically, this isn't wrong as this whole area is owned by Boston Woods Trust and they've named it "Beech Wood". Only parts of it are actually managed forest though. It's built like a park, with exercising spots, benches and tables, etc. Most importantly, it's got grassy areas, meadows, and some scrub/heath. However, I can't just map meadows on top of the wood, kind of like I tried on the right there. They just overlap and the tree icons are still displayed on top of the meadow, when there aren't actually trees there. I'd really like it if there was a tag such as [leisure=nature_reserve][2] for areas like this. That way the whole area wouldn't just be represented as a wood, and you'd be able to map smaller areas within it, like you do with national parks and nature reserves. What's the alternative? Should I map each separate wood area, and then merge the polygons and name it as "Beech Wood"? Should the meadow polygons also be merged since they're part of the park/wood/area? Or did I just make a needlessly long thread about what is clearly a nature reserve? Even though I've not seen it categorised as such anywhere? [1]: https://i.imgur.com/O09rhVq.png [2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve