Should islands/islets be the inner border of natural=bay areas? Recently, Gulf of Bothnia ([https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8421537][1]) between Sweden and Finland was changed from a single node into a huge multipolygon area. This has lead to some problems on several map services. For example both Mapbox and Wikimedia Maps seem to treat natural=bay as a water area, resulting in all of the islands turning invisible on their maps. Due to the sheer amount of islands, to me it seems almost impossible to add all of them as inner boundaries of the natural=bay area. I am familiar with the concept of "don't tag for the renderer", so I wonder what is correct mapping in this case? Should Gulf of Bothnia be changed back into a node or should it stay as an area? [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8421537

Should islands/islets be the inner border of natural=bay areas? Recently, Gulf of Bothnia ([https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8421537][1]) between Sweden and Finland was changed from a single node into a huge area. This has lead to some problems on several map services. For example both Mapbox and Wikimedia Maps seem to treat natural=bay as a water area, resulting in all of the islands turning invisible on their maps. Due to the sheer amount of islands, to me it seems almost impossible to add all of them as inner boundaries of the natural=bay area. I am familiar with the concept of "don't tag for the renderer", so I wonder what is correct mapping in this case? Should Gulf of Bothnia be changed back into a node or should it stay as an area? [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8421537