The simple answer is yes, you can use any tag you like, even if some mappers disapprove of it. However, the example you gave is one in which the tagging is incorrect on two counts. It is neither an amenity nor a camp_site. camp\_site. Your assumption about the camp<u> </u>site camp\_site tag is 100% correct. It should have been a tagged as leisure=caravan<u> </u>site _leisure_=caravan\_site and then optionally enhanced with other tags that more fully describe the object such as, for example, fee=yes/no, capacity=*, sanitary<u> </u>dump<u> </u>station=yes/no, sanitary\_dump\_station=yes/no, etc. The amenity=trailer<u> </u>park amenity=trailer\_park tagging would not be appropriate for a caravan<u> </u>site caravan\_site because such places trailer parks are set up for more or less permanent residency. People live there in portable or mobile homes but for the most part they are merely landuse=residential. Same with place=hamlet. This is a permanent area of dense population, similar to a town or village but smaller. Cheers, Dave

The simple answer is yes, you can use any tag you like, even if some mappers disapprove of it. However, the example you gave is one in which the tagging is incorrect on two counts. It is neither an amenity nor a camp_site. Your assumption about the camp<u> </u>site tag is 100% correct. It should have been a tagged as leisure=caravan<u> </u>site and then optionally enhanced with other tags that more fully describe the object such as, for example, fee=yes/no, capacity=*, sanitary<u> </u>dump<u> </u>station=yes/no, etc. The amenity=trailer<u> </u>park tagging would not be appropriate for a caravan<u> </u>site because those such places are set up for more or less permanent residency. People live there in portable or mobile homes but for the most part it is they are merely landuse=residential. Same with place-hamlet. place=hamlet. This is a permanent area of dense population, like similar to a town or village but smaller. Cheers, Dave

The simple answer is yes, you can use any tag you like, even if some mappers disapprove of it. However, the example you gave is one in which the tagging is incorrect on two counts. It is neither an amenity nor a camp_site. Your assumption about the camp<u> </u>site tag is 100% correct. It should have been a tagged as leisure=caravan<u> </u>site and then optionally enhanced with other tags that more fully describe the object such as, for example, fee=yes/no, capacity=*, sanitary<u> </u>dump<u> </u>station=yes/no, etc. The amenity=trailer<u> </u>park tagging would not be appropriate for a caravan<u> </u>site because those places are set up for more or less permanent residency. People live there in portable or mobile homes but for the most part it is merely landuse=residential. Same with place-hamlet. This is a permanent area of population, like a town but smaller. Cheers, Dave