I would go for something like this: * building=service * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery * operator=FAA * seamark:type=landmark * seamark:landmark:category=dome * seamark:landmark:function=radar * [image](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image)=https://i.imgur.com/ivO9yxc.jpg (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) I am not that sure about how useful the seamark stuff is, as it more or less duplicates the other tags. I think that at least if there is marine traffic in that area it might be useful to use those tags too. And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio_transponder .

I would go for something like this: * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery * operator=FAA * seamark:type=landmark * seamark:landmark:category=dome * seamark:landmark:function=radar * [image](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image)=https://i.imgur.com/ivO9yxc.jpg (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) I am not that sure about how useful the seamark stuff is, as it more or less duplicates the other tags. I think that at least if there is marine traffic in that area it might be useful to use those tags too. And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio_transponder .

I would go for something like this: * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery * seamark:type=landmark * seamark:landmark:category=dome * seamark:landmark:function=radar * [image](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image)=https://i.imgur.com/ivO9yxc.jpg (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) I am not that sure about how useful the seamark stuff is, as it more or less duplicates the other tags. I think that at least if there is marine traffic in that area it might be useful to use those tags too. And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio_transponder .

I would go for something like this: * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery * seamark:type=landmark * seamark:landmark:category=dome * seamark:landmark:function=radar (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) I am not that sure about how useful the seamark stuff is, as it more or less duplicates the other tags. I think that at least if there is marine traffic in that area it might be useful to use those tags too. And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio transponder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio_transponder .

I would go for something like this: * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery * seamark:type=landmark * seamark:landmark:category=dome * seamark:landmark:function=radar (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) I am not that sure about how useful the seamark stuff is, as it more or less duplicates the other tags. I think that at least if there is marine traffic in that area it might be useful to use those tags too. And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio transponder .

I would go for something like this: * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery * seamark:type=landmark * seamark:landmark:category=dome * seamark:landmark:function=radar (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio transponder .

I would go for something like this: * [man_made=tower](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower) * tower:type=radar * tower:construction=dome * height=35 * source:height=estimation from side photo and aerial imagery (height given in metres, assumed that you mean 0.3048 metre feet. And based on a back-of-the-envelope calculation which resulted in 115 ft total height) And if you know more technical (function) details, over there are additional tag suggestions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:radio transponder .