I've come across some natural areas with a web or mesh of hiking trails. For example, [Enchanted Rock SNA - 19/30.49912/-98.82005][1]. Should all of these be mapped? On the park's map, there is a marked interpretive trail somewhere in here but it does not cover all of the trails. I've seen similar trail meshes in other places, all very well-traveled and obvious. Should these be mapped? Note/Edit: this question is about *if*, not *how*, in response to a similar GMM edit I made which was reviewed/discouraged citing that they don't usually add those types of auxiliary trails. I was wondering if OSM had a similar standard or if it's encouraged. [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/30.49912/-98.82005

I've come across some natural areas with a web or mesh of hiking trails. For example, [Enchanted Rock SNA - 19/30.49912/-98.82005][1]. Should all of these be mapped? On the park's map, there is a marked interpretive trail somewhere in here but it does not cover all of the trails. I've seen similar trail meshes in other places, all very well-traveled and obvious. Should these be mapped? Note/Edit: this question is in response to a similar GMM edit I made which was reviewed/discouraged citing that they don't usually add those types of auxiliary trails. I was wondering if OSM had a similar standard or if it's encouraged. [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/30.49912/-98.82005

I've come across some natural areas with a web or mesh of hiking trails. For example, [Enchanted Rock SNA - 19/30.49912/-98.82005][1]. Should all of these be mapped? On the park's map, there is a marked interpretive trail somewhere in here but it does not cover all of the trails. I've seen similar trail meshes in other places, all very well-traveled and obvious. Should these be mapped? [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/30.49912/-98.82005