On openstreetmap.org, mouse-wheel zooming is far too sensitive and impossible to control with an Apple Magic Mouse (whose “mouse wheel” is a touch panel). Using the website is very frustrating. Specifically, while panning around with mouse click, every mouse-up risks zooming the map randomly in or out. Whether trying to zoom or not, even very small movements risk unintentionally zooming two or three levels at a time. Sometimes a zoom out is immediately followed by an unintentional zoom in, or vice versa. Sometimes I have to attempt a zoom several times in a row, and the repeated and jumpy visual zoom is on the verge of inducing motion sickness. Is there a way to reduce the mouse-wheel sensitivity for the site? Barring that, is there a way to disable it? Background info: * This is the mouse that comes with all desktop Macs. * There is no software sensitivity control for this mouse’s zoom. * Scrolling and zooming work very well in most other apps and websites (for example, scroll-zooming in Google Maps is pretty good).

On openstreetmap.org, mouse-wheel zooming is far too sensitive and impossible to control with an Apple Magic Mouse (whose “mouse wheel” is a touch panel). Using the website is very frustrating. Specifically, while panning around with mouse click, every mouse-up risks zooming the map randomly in or out. Whether trying to zoom or not, even very small movements risk unintentionally zooming two or three levels at a time. Sometimes a zoom out is immediately followed by an unintentional zoom in, or vice versa. Sometimes I have to attempt a zoom several times in a row, and the repeated and jumpy visual zoom is on the verge of inducing motion sickness. Is there a way to reduce the mouse-wheel sensitivity for the site? Barring that, is there a way to disable it? Background info: * This is the mouse that comes with all desktop Macs. * There is no software sensitivity control for this mouse’s zoom. * Scrolling and zooming work very well in most other apps and websites (for example, scroll-zooming in Google Maps is pretty good).