Hi there,

I am trying to change the tagging of some city centre pedestrian shared use paths so they can be better consumed by providers such as Cycle OSM, and properly marked as such on these services.

I am in the UK, and I was wondering what the tagging convention would be for such a path - shared by pedestrians and cyclists, no marked delineation between the two and no usual access for cars.

Regards,

Harvey

asked 29 Oct '21, 11:17

hblu's gravatar image

hblu
11112
accept rate: 0%

4

Please ask on the talk-gb mailing list. The developers of cycle.travel , Cyclestreets and OpenCycleMap are all active on that list. As both services have been in use for some considerable time I would expect they will have picked up any significant routing issues some time ago. It is also advisable to stick to current (UK) local conventions, and please avoid tagging for one specific renderer (CycleOSM)

Note the recommendation of highway=path on the wiki, does not necessarily accord with consensus tagging in the UK for cycle infra.

(30 Oct '21, 09:57) SK53 ♦

Mainly you are looking for segregated=no. highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated segregated=no surface=paved or highway=cycleway foot=designated segregated=no surface=paved

permanent link

answered 30 Oct '21, 08:09

Kovoschiz's gravatar image

Kovoschiz
2.4k31146
accept rate: 17%

edited 30 Oct '21, 10:27

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×15
×4

question asked: 29 Oct '21, 11:17

question was seen: 367 times

last updated: 30 Oct '21, 10:27

powered by OSQA