In the alpine area, near the tree line there are a lot of areas that are covered with just a few trees. There are far too many to map each tree individually, but the trees are too far apart to call it a forest or woodland. The trees are mostly pines, so the scrub tag is not correct. On other maps I have seen that these areas are rendered as a green dotted area, but I do not know if OSM has a tag for this. Has anyone got any examples of the correct tags?

asked 25 Oct, 20:58

Amanning's gravatar image

Amanning
2467816
accept rate: 0%

1

I think Krummholz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krummholz), which I think is what you are referring to, is generally accepted as an ecological woodland habitat rather than a scrub one, despite the relative sparsity of trees. Long ago someone suggested to me Hexbinning tree locations as a way of estimating density.

(27 Oct, 10:02) SK53 ♦

wood:density= (~15k instances) was raised in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural=wood#Density_of_woodland , most being =sparse (~13k instances) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wood=density#values . Other *:density= was proposed for =scrub and =shrubbery.

permanent link

answered 26 Oct, 05:16

Kovoschiz's gravatar image

Kovoschiz
1.7k31039
accept rate: 13%

edited 26 Oct, 05:16

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×41
×17
×11

question asked: 25 Oct, 20:58

question was seen: 169 times

last updated: 27 Oct, 10:02

powered by OSQA