Example area: London, Stretch of a Northern tube line between Edgware and Colindale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.6014/-0.2575) There are tracks and a fenced area with trees/bushes on both sides. As I understand that's a buffer zone which is maintained (or at least owned) by Tube/Rail company. I see it's mapped as So what would you suggest as a better option? asked 03 Oct '20, 19:16 laechoppe |
2 Answers:
Most people would tag it as Rather than remove the landuse tag, you might want to change its value: answered 03 Oct '20, 21:58 n76 |
Adding to the answer above, according to this page in Russia they voted for the same approach (use of answered 04 Oct '20, 20:14 laechoppe |
Exactly what can be inferred from "landuse=forest" and "natural=wood" has been debated for some time - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest for a discussion of that.
"landuse=railway" (in addition to something that says "there are trees here") sounds good for what you are describing though.
Could add an explicit
managed=yes
if one knows thenatural=wood
is actively maintained. Sometimes there are vegetation growing mindlessly on managed lands.