When prefixing It is still present as a landmark, though, and should be rendered, in my opinion. Is this wrong tagging? Concerns Goldeck Pendelbahn, which stopped operating two years ago, but still exists. asked 21 Sep '20, 16:17 ecuapac |
This is probably a rare case where amenity=* + disused=yes is appropriate rather than then the use of a lifecycle prefix. To a certain extent it depends on what use-cases might be anticipated: is the presence of an aerial cableway important for routing, or is it a significant landmark? This is always an issue when a tag relates to two concepts: in this case a transport facility and a physical structure. Also would the casual passer-by be aware that it was disused. If the cable and cabins are still visible (depending on whether the cabins are detachable) then it is perfectly possible to not be aware that it is not in service. Disused lifecycle tagging does cover a range of scenarios: for instance with cableway it might cover any of the following scenarios:
Some infrastructure often exists long after a cableway has been demolished: for instance the top stations at Punta Indren (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149862631), Furggen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129217279), and Fil de Cassons/Cassongrat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232100249). answered 23 Sep '20, 14:31 SK53 ♦ |
Using the Of the physical infrastructure you can map the pylons It should be up to the map renderers to consider placing a answered 22 Sep '20, 07:36 TZorn It's a good question whether such a cableway pylon should still be
(22 Sep '20, 08:10)
Kovoschiz
|
Another option could be just adding disused=yes tag, which is also clear, but does not change rendering - see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused answered 22 Sep '20, 12:49 kocio 2
While adding "disused=yes" can be problematic (for example if an object had two main tags in OSM - which function is now disused?), in a case where something is "still obviously a thing" it might be appropriate - I believe I've used it on canals that are still full of water but no longer have traffic on them, for example.
(22 Sep '20, 12:56)
SomeoneElse ♦
(22 Sep '20, 20:27)
Richard ♦
|