The case I'm interested in is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625808720 It is the only bus stop on that route that is included in the route relation ("Bus 4" is the one I'm currently interested in). The wiki seems to say that the stop should not have a But when I use the relations analyser I get a problem flag for this bus stop: the analyser doesn't like that this it's part of the route relation Which is correct, please? asked 15 Nov '19, 11:08 eteb3 |
Both. They are two different questions.
Of course stops shouldn't have
The problem is you forgot to add the role An additional suggestion: The answered 15 Nov '19, 12:31 Kovoschiz Thanks: I've made the role 'platform'. So to be clear, all the other bus stops should be added to that route relation? Eg, this one where currently only the road is part of the route relation.
(15 Nov '19, 14:54)
eteb3
Why is this?
(15 Nov '19, 14:55)
eteb3
|
Wiki says (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#Bus_stop):
Use of the tags route_ref=, 'location' and 'towards' is no longer recommended in conjunction with highway=bus_stop. This information should instead be associated with the corresponding route= relation.
route_ref=
is an acceptable, crude first step. Only that you have to make the relation to consider it done.