I've contributed to OSM on and off for years but I'm getting back in to it due to work and Google's new pricing being prohibitive.

I've set up a server to handle tiles, geocoding and routing for the planet which is great but one pattern is each tool has to do lots of mucking around to put the nodes, ways and relations in to a reasonable order.

The pbf format has the capability to be indexed but its never used. Is there a reason for that? Numerical id order makes sense for doing the dump, but not at all for any kind of processing.

I'd imagine a simple geohash grouping of everything done once would improve import speeds and slicing speeds immensely since relevant nodes for a way would be physically located closely thus maximising cache hits.

Is there a reason this isn't done that I've missed? If not I'm tempted to make a indexer and make the relevant patches to the tools that could benefit from it the most.

asked 15 Oct '18, 06:15

cheater512's gravatar image

cheater512
6126
accept rate: 0%

1

This help site is designed for questions and answers but not really suited for starting large discussions. It sounds like you have an interesting issue to discuss. Try posting it at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/ instead.

(15 Oct '18, 09:05) scai ♦
Be the first one to answer this question!
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×196
×45
×6

question asked: 15 Oct '18, 06:15

question was seen: 207 times

last updated: 15 Oct '18, 09:05

powered by OSQA