Problem

I'm mapping a suburb right now. There are multiple features on each property, like the house, garage, trees, and a shed. How do we map these properties to show that these features belong to the same address?

Possible Solution

I'm considering mapping a property as a residential area with an address key, encompassing the house and other features that belong to that address. I've tried mapping the objects together as a relation and it seems like mapping with an area would be much neater. Is this approach kosher?

Note

To respect the homeowners' privacy, I'm only mapping features that are visible from the street.

asked 31 Aug '18, 17:49

XavierTO's gravatar image

XavierTO
16112
accept rate: 0%


Hi XavierTO -- my recommendation would be to simply put address tags on the main house, rather than worrying about tagging the land itself or the outbuildings. It's usually pretty easy to tell visually from the map which outbuildings are associated with which structures.

That said, there's no technical problem that I know of with drawing an area that contains the buildings in question and tagging that area with the address.

No technical problem... but there still may be reasons not to. It's almost always the house itself that is physically decorated with the address in the real world. When you decide that the address belongs to the whole lot, you're making an assumption -- a pretty safe one, but the real world is messy and before long you'll probably run into some iffy cases. A shared garage, an empty lot that may or may not belong to the house next to it, etc.

For ongoing maintenance of the map, it's better to have things tagged in a consistent way rather than in a surprising way. Most mappers will expect to see the address tags on the main houses, and might not even notice them on the areas, which can lead to double-tagging.

Another reason is third-party software compatibility -- many programs that use OSM data are written to expect addresses on buildings and nodes, and may not even recognize different schemes.

In short, simply tagging the main house is 1) good enough 2) much easier than creating an area or a relation 3) less likely to introduce errors of assumption, 4) easier to maintain, and 5) more likely to be compatible with software.

permanent link

answered 31 Aug '18, 19:03

jmapb's gravatar image

jmapb
1.0k61522
accept rate: 19%

edited 01 Sep '18, 07:41

Privatemajory's gravatar image

Privatemajory
970111831

Hi jmapb - thank you for taking the time to explain these issues. I really appreciate it.

(01 Sep '18, 02:14) XavierTO

Maybe house numbers being for buildings is a European thing? In Australia they are called street numbers, usually assigned per the cadastral parcel, regardless of if there is a house or not, so in my opinion they should be on the land parcel can be a way with the address, optionally with a landuse tag.

(02 Sep '18, 11:09) aharvey

@harvey, depends. House numbers can define an entrance (Italy), parcels, part of buildings/plots, individual flats. BTW, in Denmark and The Netherlands is is recommended to map the housenumber as a point, not on the building outline.

(03 Sep '18, 06:09) escada

I have noticed that many mappers map the fence lines that separate properties and that groups the data visually quite well.

permanent link

answered 31 Aug '18, 21:46

nevw's gravatar image

nevw
8.5k2583152
accept rate: 10%

edited 31 Aug '18, 21:48

Hi nevw - I agree. I've done the same thing and it does separate them quite well.

(01 Sep '18, 02:16) XavierTO

Hi, and many mappers put the fence line entirely around each property or plot resulting in many duplications of sections of fence.

Further, some mappers also enclose the property or plot by placing fence lines along the party wall of semi-detached properties. Resulting in fence lines through the insides of buildings.

(03 Sep '18, 07:19) BCNorwich
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×164
×102
×33
×13
×4

question asked: 31 Aug '18, 17:49

question was seen: 438 times

last updated: 03 Sep '18, 07:19

powered by OSQA