|
In a scenario where there is a slip road and pedestrian island, which crossing ( Street Crossing 1 or Street Crossing 2 ) should have the crossing:island=yes tag? Or should both of them have it? |
|
Neither. In your case, for each single crossing, there's no island in the middle of the road. See crossing:island for more info and a visual example of what crossing:island=yes is intended to represent. Hi, thanks for your response! Then I guess the "island" in between the two crossings is not considered an island? What would it be called instead? How about the "island" between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1083735850 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1434767726 ? Or, do you only mean that these are considered islands, as seen on the wiki page: https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/gallery/medianrefugeisland_3d/medianrefugeisland_parking_3d_0.jpg
(13 Jul '18, 18:00)
MeghanKNg
The area between those two nodes is typically referred to as an island, but this is different from the OSM crossing:island. I'm not aware of an OSM tag that can be used to represent an island between two crossings like this. For an example of crossing:island, see here (sorry for the use of Google).
(13 Jul '18, 18:58)
alester
|
|
I would set it for none of the crossings. I think the If you want to map the area of the traffic island do it like in this example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390896480 (or one of the other tags mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=traffic_island ). |
