Hi, Quite off season but well. I'm tagging a lot of christmas trees plantation around my place. I always used: 1) The rational is that in my country christmas trees must be grown in a farmland: legally you cannot cut a forest to grow christmas trees instead. In addition, they will be always cut before getting more than 2 m height, and they are grown in places that can be far from forested areas. So I exclude the tagging scheme But recently, I came across: 2) What do you think? Merry Christmas, juminet asked 21 May '18, 13:47 juminet |
I would not use landuse=farmland and rely on the produce tag. This in general violates the principle of least surprise. I think that landuse=plant_nursery is the most widely used tag for this purpose. See the wiki. Note that christmas trees may be one of several species of conifer. answered 21 May '18, 17:26 SK53 ♦ Indeed, I think that's the most adequate tagging scheme. I'll start replacing "my" christmas trees fields.
(22 May '18, 19:47)
juminet
|
I think all of those tagging methods are correct, including sectioning off a portion of farmland as a forested area of the entereprise if preferred. Depending on the individual situation any one of those methods would be correct for a particular case. Merry Xmas answered 21 May '18, 14:31 nevw |
Similar https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50624/are-knee-high-trees-a-forest