Hi,

This question is about those forest trails that exist primarily beause a lot of people have used them (unpaved), or may be gravel paved but narrow and not suitable for normal bicycle use.

Are they highway=path, bicycle=no - or highway=footpath - or are both eually fine?

The picture in the UI of the new simple tag system in Potlatch implies that footpaths are constructed paths...

What about mountain bikes? Many such trails are rideable by mountain-bike, but it may not be allowed (which means that you could ride that trail on a normal bike - if you'd be willing to do that to your bicycle)

But other trails would not be rideable by a normal bicycle under any circumstances, only an mbt would do.

What I am after it some thing like this

  • highway=trail
  • bicycle=possible

Regards, Hans Olav

asked 16 Jul '11, 08:17

Hans%20O%20Nymand's gravatar image

Hans O Nymand
50225
accept rate: 0%


You should tag them with highway=path and use mtb:scale for bicycle classification. Further tags like sac_scale, surface or trail_visibility might be useful, too. Using these tags allows a better classification than the rather simple highway=trail.

permanent link

answered 16 Jul '11, 09:03

scai's gravatar image

scai ♦
31.1k18281434
accept rate: 23%

The bicycle tag is for the legal access rights for cycling along that path, on any type of (non-motorised) bike. So this will depend on general access rights in your country, plus any local by-laws or restrictions.

If you have a general right to cycle along that path, it should be tagged as bicycle=yes. If cycling is generally allowed by landowner, that can be tagged as bicycle=permissive. If cycling is forbidden, then bicycle=no.

Then use extra tags (eg mtb:scale) for how easy it is to cycle along it, or whether a mountain bike is required.

permanent link

answered 16 Jul '11, 13:15

Vclaw's gravatar image

Vclaw
9.1k891140
accept rate: 22%

edited 16 Jul '11, 13:16

This kind of path is often called a "footpad" - a trail that exists only through the action of feet on soil. There isn't a good, official way to describe it in OSM. highway=trail sounds ok, but it has very little usage.

I did just discover "highway=path, path=hiking". Maybe that's suitable?

permanent link

answered 16 Jul '11, 14:16

Stevage's gravatar image

Stevage
224136
accept rate: 0%

1

FYI, planners call these trails 'desire lines' or 'desire trails'. They sometimes reroute official trails to follow them. I agree there is no clear way to designate them in potlatch, and indicating their accessibility to bikes is difficult for some of us to assess.

(16 Jul '11, 17:19) gpsdork
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×15

question asked: 16 Jul '11, 08:17

question was seen: 3,817 times

last updated: 16 Jul '11, 17:19

powered by OSQA