|
In both cases, the public may not access the road/place, but the owner can. |
|
From the perspective of a data consumer, I've always treated them as identical. As Hendrikklaas mentions, the access wiki page does have some different wording for "no" and "private", and "no" tends to get used when a transport mode is "not allowed" (e.g. motor_vehicle=no on a street that you could physically drive along, but no-one is allowed to) whereas "private" tends to get used when only certain people are allowed to by the owner, but as far as deciding what to do based on the data, I'd treat them as equal. |
|
The Wiki page for the access=no combo claims that access=no is "stronger" than access=private. For example, the only access=no roads I have seen where I live (north of Stockholm) are inside the fence around Arlanda airport. In the cases of military and government facilities access=private also would not be quite correct because the land is not privately owned to begin with.
(29 Apr '18, 18:55)
Shoe Puppet
|
|
Hi Shoe puppet, Plaese read these lines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_tag_values That does not answer the question at all.
(29 Apr '18, 10:54)
Shoe Puppet
|
