People do not seems to enter building heights or levels. That is OK for 2D vectoral representation but if you go 3D it is a problem. The information is simply missing so the 3D views are not correct. I found it almost impossible to update it one by one. Is there a way to update them at once? If not for this purpose can we have some kind of area tags as dense to sparse/high to low in gradient so that we can get a general height information. asked 29 May '17, 07:59 Europa |
The reason why people rarely enter building heights or levels is that many buildings are drawn from aerial imagery where you can't see how high the building is. A general fuzzy area height information is probably not a good match with OSM, but you can of course get third-party DEM data and mix that with OSM to achieve the desired result. In some areas such data is even available as open data. answered 29 May '17, 08:02 Frederik Ramm ♦ Yes the reason is very obvious. The problem is using some public DEM data will not fix the missing height information in OSM database.
(29 May '17, 08:45)
Europa
3
Hi Europa, there seems to be one other way. Since OSM depends on the mapper / volunteers for the data go out and make a survey in your own area and start enlarging the area bit by bit steadily :-)
(29 May '17, 09:13)
Hendrikklaas
So. I'd LOVE to do this for my local university campus. The university does not publish the height (either in feet or stories) but does publish photographs, and I can count. However, the very first building I tried did not have a "Levels" field, although subsequent ones did, and no clear way for me to add it. Brand new to OSM editing. Can someone give a pointer maybe?
(08 Jun '17, 01:52)
dopensm
5
in iD (the editor in the browser), open the "All tags" section, press + , type "level" in the left side, type the number of levels in the right box. Done. Please create a new question next time, do not add follow -up questions as answers.
(08 Jun '17, 04:11)
escada
3
Keep in mind that "level" indicates the floor on which the tagged object is located (e.g. an office on the second floor/level). If you want to indicate the number of floors in a building, the tag would be "building:levels".
(08 Jun '17, 16:55)
alester
But I wasn't asking a "new" question: I was asking a "related" question, in an attempt to elicit information that would make this thread more valuable for people who come upon it as the result of a search. I fail, completely, to see how asking for more detail makes for a poorer product. BTW, does anyone know where I can rent an elephant cooler? Now, that's a new question--for which I apologize.
(18 Jun '17, 13:10)
dopensm
1
@dopensm: Unfortunately the "question and answer" format here doesn't really handle discussion well - it's limited to "questions", "answers" and "comments". If I ask related questions I usually link both the original and new questions via comments - that way people can see the answers and comments on each one separately, yet still know that both exist. For some sorts of discussions though, another forum may be a better option, and where that is will depend on what the question is. For 3d stuff https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=42 might be the best place, whereas for general "why do mappers not do X" or "how do I do X" one of the mailing lists https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mailing_lists or IRC https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC might be better, and some non-English-language communities have most of their discussions in particular language forums https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php . I'm sure it's frustrating to get an reply of "don't ask that here, ask over there" but it's beneficial in the long run because if you're asking a question you'll want the maximum number of people so see it.
(18 Jun '17, 13:38)
SomeoneElse ♦
showing 5 of 7
show 2 more comments
|