Does quality of data correlate with the tool used to add it?

I feel that the quality of Open Street Map data depends on the tool (editor) that the users use. My conjecture is, some tools make it hard to add correct data:

Don't check for basic mistakes (e.g. unconnected ways)
Don't remind the user to add various frequently-used data fields (e.g. changeset description)
Make it possible to degrade (e.g. delete) data inadvertently

Is this justified?

If yes, what can we do about it (for example, list common errors for common tools, and how to avoid them)?

asked 27 Mar '17, 13:39

anatolyg
201●5●6●13
accept rate: 0%

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

*italic* or _italic_
**bold** or __bold__
link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
basic HTML tags are also supported

learn more about Markdown

Question tags:

editing ×352
tools ×35
quality ×23
mistakes ×8

question asked: 27 Mar '17, 13:39

question was seen: 1,218 times

last updated: 27 Mar '17, 13:39

Does quality of data correlate with the tool used to add it?

Follow this question

Related questions