NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is no longer in use from 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum

Hello, there.

In forest or woods, there can be transitional areas on which all trees have been cut years ago, and which are merely scrub, maintained or not, with cut-lines or not. These areas are morphologically scrubs, but are maintained to be brought back to a forest; besides, the scrub state lasts for years, justifying its mapping as such, so how to map these areas?

  1. Tagging them as both landuse=forest+natural=scrub?
  2. Tagging them as natural=scrub, and include them as an inner member of a landuse=forest multipolygon?
  3. Another way?

Awaiting your answers,

Regards.

asked 13 Mar '17, 09:53

Penegal's gravatar image

Penegal
631313547
accept rate: 0%


I've always tagged those as landuse=forest+natural=scrub, but note the caveat below.

While the landuse=forest vs natural=wood semantic debate is not fully settled, I've always gone with the "landuse=forest is for forestry-like activities and implies natural=wood/landcover=trees unless otherwise tagged" interpretation. I feel this interpretation has become largely dominant, but that may be my observation bias.

permanent link

answered 13 Mar '17, 12:34

Vincent%20de%20Phily's gravatar image

Vincent de P... ♦
17.3k18152249
accept rate: 19%

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×44
×15
×3

question asked: 13 Mar '17, 09:53

question was seen: 2,945 times

last updated: 13 Mar '17, 12:34

NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is no longer in use from 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum