Underlay accuracy: Bing aerial vs MapBox satellite imagery

Greetings!
Relative noob to OSM here, but long-time mapping and digital cartography enthusiast...
I recently got involved in OSM as part of a Red Cross volunteer effort to map the capital of Malawi and its environs - and I've been continuing to flesh out that area on my own time, as they have VERY little GPS-equipped ground surveying.
The original volunteer effort was unfortunately using outdated Bing imagery as its base - I've since found that it's at least 5-6 years out of date. The MapBox satellite imagery is much more recent... But there's a bit of skew between both sources (I assume because of low rate of image sampling), and I don't see guidelines on which source to default to (if any) when there are very few GPS traces available to use.
It's clear that this skew is purely local - but knowing that one source tends to sample far more heavily than the other would lead me to choose that imagery source as the more authoritative one.

Thx in advance...
GR

asked 18 Oct '16, 20:52

GregRetro
354●7●9●17
accept rate: 50%

Jeez. Just realized my question was missing an important point... By "skew", I mean that Mapbox and Bing data doesn't line up identically when using them as background. Sometimes the OSM data lines up with Bing, sometimes MapBox, sometimes neither. Hopefully that helps.

(18 Oct '16, 23:53) GregRetro

One Answer:

active answers oldest answers newest answers popular answers

Using JOSM, I downloaded the gps traces and loaded the Strava Heatmap imagery for the Lilongwe area. The shift between Bing and Mapbox was only a few metres for areas I checked which seems to be the same as in the areas I normally map. If there is a particular area that is badly affected, you could contact the local Red Cross and ask if they could upload local gpx traces to sort out which imagery is better located. I know of no other method to align the satellite imagery other than using local gps traces and the Strava Heatmap. JOSM allows the downloading of a much bigger area if you choose to download only the 'Raw GPS data', then add the imagery to discern which of Bing and Mapbox is best locally. You can also right-click the satellite layer to realign each of them to a best fit with the gps and Strava data before downloading the osm data to begin mapping. Screen Image

permanent link

answered 19 Oct '16, 03:40

nevw
9.8k●26●90●178
accept rate: 9%

edited 19 Oct '16, 06:10

Thanks very much, nevw...
Realized there were more GPS traces there than I thought - just none where I was working. (in the NW of the screenshotted map).
I've also started finding traces there that are so far removed from either aerial source that I'm suspecting that the generating device was mis-calibrated or something. Yay fun.
I'm looking forward to working in JOSM, where it sounds like much of this issue is easier resolved. Thx again for your time!

(21 Oct '16, 07:55) GregRetro

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

*italic* or _italic_
**bold** or __bold__
link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
basic HTML tags are also supported

learn more about Markdown

Question tags:

bing ×83
satellite ×50
mapbox ×40
aerial_imagery ×28
accuracy ×25

question asked: 18 Oct '16, 20:52

question was seen: 4,869 times

last updated: 21 Oct '16, 07:55

Underlay accuracy: Bing aerial vs MapBox satellite imagery

Follow this question

Related questions