If I'm mapping a university, is it OK for me to tag buildings with a asked 16 May '11, 12:57 Sam Foster Jonathan Ben... |
It works, but in my opinion "function" is a bit a of an overly generic word. It's a bit like the word "type". I think we should avoid those kinds of words as keys. Some functions could maybe be better covered by existing tags. For example the canteen could perhaps be mapped as a restaurant (although if it's very private, then that might be poor fit) The careers centre is a lot like a job centre or employment agency, which we're missing decent tag documentation on unfortunately, but the point is you can map these things with "top-level" tags rather than using a generic word "function". Another approach used by some mappers, is to represent some types/functions of buildings within the building tag. So instead of just building=yes, do building=catering or something. A bit weird but probably better than using a new "function" key. I thought we had a page on the wiki about campus mapping, but maybe it was my imagination. So today I wrote a bunch more stuff on the Tag:amenity=unversity page, although I haven't actually answered your question. We could add more detail to the 'Detailed campus mapping' section (or this could go new 'University campuses' wiki page) answered 17 May '11, 13:49 Harry Wood |
Harry thanks for that I just typed a big comment and lost it - Doh! basically I'll remove the amenity=university tag from my buidlings. I'm using name= to label most, but need to use nodes for where many departments occupy one big building. Is that reasonable? answered 17 May '11, 14:00 Sam Foster IMHO it is.
(17 May '11, 15:02)
petschge
|