Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

Hello (again).

I've been told in a JOSM ticket that the wiki states that disused:railway=* requires railway=disused, and, indeed, the wiki says that. I don't understand why as, AFAIK, the lifecycle prefixing doesn't requires this, as it merely intends to suppress the(highway|railway|*)=disused tagging. Requiring to keep this deprecated and redundant data sounds inconsistent and confusing to me, especially if this requirement is limited to railways. How do things stand regarding this matter?

Awaiting your answers,

Regards.

asked 16 Jul '16, 11:18

Penegal
631●31●35●47
accept rate: 0%

Be the first one to answer this question!

toggle preview

community wiki:

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

*italic* or _italic_
**bold** or __bold__
link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
basic HTML tags are also supported

learn more about Markdown

Question tags:

tagging ×900
wiki ×67
railway ×58
disused ×17
lifecycle_prefixes ×1

question asked: 16 Jul '16, 11:18

question was seen: 1,531 times

last updated: 16 Jul '16, 11:18

Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

Follow this question

Related questions