Why not ask your question on the new OpenStreetMap Community Forum?

For small settlements such as Levisham in North Yorkshire, UK is it more appropriate to:

  1. Surround the whole settlement in a "Residential Area" (this seems to be most common)
  2. Surround it in "Hamlet" and subdivide each side of the main street as a residential area
  3. Just surround it in "Hamlet" (This seems most sensible to me)

asked 10 Jun '16, 15:29

BarnsleyOli's gravatar image

accept rate: 0%

Personally, I'd:

o Add a node (which already exists at the centre of the village: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/347054261 )

o Add the residential area but not name it (already done: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169707505 )

I wouldn't tend to add a "name" to the residential part of a village because often in rural areas the village contains far more than just the residential area. However, there are plenty of people doing this (both in addition to a place node and in place of it).

permanent link

answered 10 Jun '16, 15:48

SomeoneElse's gravatar image

SomeoneElse ♦
accept rate: 16%

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 10 Jun '16, 15:29

question was seen: 3,314 times

last updated: 10 Jun '16, 15:48

powered by OSQA