Hello, there.

I wondered: a lot of wetlands in my land are marshes, but they are frequently covered with trees; in fact, most of them are wet woods, with a wet but not inundated soil, with both trees and marsh-type, herbaceous vegetation. How should I map these? I thought about wetland=swamp, but that seems to describe more bayou-style, inundated wetland.

Awaiting your answers,

Regards.

asked 29 Feb '16, 09:33

Penegal's gravatar image

Penegal
631293345
accept rate: 0%


Mapping natural features isn't simple indeed. Natural areas don't have such clear boundaries like we humans would sometimes want, and neither are they as stable as we'd often want (a bit of rain can seriously change the look of a piece of land).

wetland=swamp seems indeed like the best choice for your case (it doesn't have to be always flooded).

permanent link

answered 29 Feb '16, 12:51

Sanderd17's gravatar image

Sanderd17
1.1k51637
accept rate: 33%

-1

Hi Penegal, Take a look at description of the natural pages in the Wiki it could be your answer. Either permanently or seasonally covered by water.

permanent link

answered 29 Feb '16, 11:52

Hendrikklaas's gravatar image

Hendrikklaas
8.5k178210351
accept rate: 6%

2

Well, I already searched the wiki, but found nothing corresponding to my case, nothing certain in any case, so I asked here.

(29 Feb '16, 13:21) Penegal
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×13
×2
×2
×1
×1

question asked: 29 Feb '16, 09:33

question was seen: 1,369 times

last updated: 29 Feb '16, 13:21

powered by OSQA