NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is no longer in use from 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum

In Denmark we have a node of all addresses. Not only does these nodes contain the address (and a unique street number) but also the municipality (and the unique municipality number) and an identifier from the source amongst other things.

My question is when I want to add e.g. a restaurant it has an address. Should I then add the restaurant to the address node or create a new node?

My concern is that if I add it to the address node, when the restaurant goes out of business, someone might just delete the node instead of just removing the tags, hence deleting valuable information.

But if I create two nodes, and I search for the address, two results might show up: 1 for just the address, and one for the restaurant.

asked 04 Sep '15, 10:00

tbrixen's gravatar image

tbrixen
36112
accept rate: 0%

edited 07 Sep '15, 23:23

aseerel4c26's gravatar image

aseerel4c26 ♦
32.6k18248554


Denmark was one fo the first countries to release a full address dataset with an open licence and as a result, in OSM, its pretty much complete for address data. A byproduct of this is the Danish community have a very specific way of managing addresses across the board i.e. they are strict about them only being added to nodes, not the buildings.

I took a look through the wiki and couldn't find any guidance on your question

You might be more likely to get a region specific answer for your question on the Danish mailing list

permanent link

answered 04 Sep '15, 17:58

DaCor's gravatar image

DaCor
1.3k11129
accept rate: 2%

2

Thanks, I'll try looking through the archives, and see if there are any answers. So far I've found 1 discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/2015-May/004174.html. I'll get back here when/if if find some answer.

(07 Sep '15, 08:01) tbrixen

It seems like it's a question of taste. Generally it seems that one should not touch the address node, since it’s imported, and separately maintained. Furthermore we should not add the address to the new restaurant node.

Other reasons I found in the mailing list:

  • Since there may be multiple restaurants on the same address, it will get confusing which of the restaurants should have its name on the address node.
  • One would expect that addresses are unique hence there should not be multiple nodes with the same address.
  • A restaurant is located in some geolocation, which does not move, even if the road changes name. If the road changes name, the geolocation still does not change.

Instead, some say that we should place the POI just beside the address node, or at the entrance to the restaurant.

Sources: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/2014-September/003886.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/2015-May/004174.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/2012-April/002667.html

permanent link

answered 30 Dec '15, 11:42

tbrixen's gravatar image

tbrixen
36112
accept rate: 0%

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×930
×202
×181
×92
×2

question asked: 04 Sep '15, 10:00

question was seen: 4,754 times

last updated: 30 Dec '15, 11:42

NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is no longer in use from 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum