When mapping a residential terrace, it seems that there are 2 strategies:
The wiki page on tags doesn't help much. Please advise which is the best strategy. asked 09 Jun '14, 15:54 blokeley |
JOSM has a Terracer plugin that may provide useful guidance. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Terracer I haven't used it or mapped terraces but i would favour your first option. answered 09 Jun '14, 16:19 nevw Thanks for the tip. I use iD rather than JOSM and, as you say, it's not clear what the recommended strategy is.
(09 Jun '14, 17:01)
blokeley
|
both strategies are ok. But e.g. in Denmark, you are not allowed to add the address node to the building outline. Splitting in individual buildings is more detailed IMHO, as you could calculate the average house size if you wish to do so. answered 09 Jun '14, 16:58 escada 3
I assume "not allowed" means it is local convention not to. Do you add them to the entrance node? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance I map mainly in England and use the JOSM terracer plugin and your first method (often even for semi-detached houses as a terrace of 2 houses).
(09 Jun '14, 17:02)
EdLoach ♦
I'm not mapping in Denmark, but once read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Denmark And you're right, it is a local convention "If a building exists on the BBR unit the address node should be placed at in the middle of the longest side of the building 3 meters from the wall closest to the main (named) access road."
(09 Jun '14, 18:16)
escada
|