NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is being shutdown on 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum

I've been trying to map out the surprising (to me, anyway) array of trails in my area. Recently, I've been looking at some official trails for snowshoe-hiking.

I've been tagging snowmobile trails as "snowmobile=yes" or "snowmobile=designated" and cross-country ski trails with "ski=yes" (or "designated" as appropriate), should I start tagging trails intended for snowshoeing as "snowshoe=yes"? Or is there some other tag or combination thereof that I should use?

asked 17 Feb '14, 23:22

Epicanis's gravatar image

Epicanis
1813312
accept rate: 0%


From the wiki page for piste maps at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste_Maps I believe that you should tag the snowshoe trails as piste:type=hike, piste:grooming=backcountry

For cross country skiing it would be piste:type=nordic. That wiki page does not cover snowmobiles, and I never mapped for them (banned in areas I cross country ski) so I can't help there.

The wiki is silent on multiple use trails but I think the usual semi-colon separator could be used to indicate the different uses, e.g. piste:type=hike;nordic

permanent link

answered 18 Feb '14, 04:17

n76's gravatar image

n76
10.8k1082172
accept rate: 17%

edited 18 Feb '14, 04:18

That's actually not a bad idea (I should probably work on tagging other such trails in this area similarly) but I was thinking more in line with the access tags ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ), where for consistency I was guessing "snowshoe=yes" would be appropriate. (The trail I'm thinking of, I would probably tag "snowshoe=designated", "foot=permissive", and "ski=permissive". There's another set of trails nearby for nordic skiing where a portion is also designated for snowshoe (ski=designated, snowshoe=designated). Perhaps I should use both access tags AND "piste:".

(20 Feb '14, 18:12) Epicanis

stf: There was a recent discussion on tagging@ about shared use: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-January/016188.html

The most sensible way to tag this in my opinion is to use separate route=piste relations (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dpiste).

Remember that semicolon separated values are not likely to be used by any program.

(22 Feb '14, 16:40) yvecai

In my opinion, ski=yes/no/designated, or snowshoe=yes/no/designated are access type tags (=authorisation to snowshoe on the track), but not the type of use.

For this, piste:type=hike, piste:grooming=backcountry is currently the tag to use. If this seems too odd, maybe it could be good to start a proposal for piste:type=snowshoes.

permanent link

answered 22 Feb '14, 16:35

yvecai's gravatar image

yvecai
1.5k1226
accept rate: 9%

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×930
×23
×15
×3
×2

question asked: 17 Feb '14, 23:22

question was seen: 3,657 times

last updated: 22 Feb '14, 16:40

NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is being shutdown on 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum