|
GoTo This geometrical structure seems to reflect exactly the geographical circumstances as seen on Bing. I cannot figure out what should be done to tag it without getting another error report! It is not a junction=roundabout so that would be incorrect. Replacing the circular road with highway=turning_circle is a option but then it only be a workaround to satisfy OSMI and does not reflect the actual geographical circumstances. NOTE: I am an avid user of the errorcheck programmes and it is rather tiresome to be continually returned to such places where imho I can see no error. Here is another one: What is wrong with it? |
|
The second one is perhaps just a false positive? - the shorter path starts and ends at points on the longer path. It's worth a survey though, to see if there really is a "turnstile" on it. I can't do that. Hundreds of km away.
(03 Jan '14, 16:54)
dcp
3
To me both seem to be false positives. Interestingly I didn't encounter false positives duplicated ways on OSMI until now, although I'm trying to fix such errors regularly.
(03 Jan '14, 17:30)
scai ♦
1
I do add notes and sometimes contact the contributor in question but I would only do that if I can see a valid error which requires local knowledge to rectify! Otherwise I would be wasting not only my time but his as well.
(04 Jan '14, 07:23)
dcp
|
