In the city where I live was made public the routes and schedules of garbage trucks in PDF format. Editing the relations of the routes for public transport I asked myself, why not do it for those routes too? Reading the wiki page for relations of the routes I didn't find information or specific tags Someone did something similar? asked 22 Dec '13, 21:47 5m4u9 |
Gritting routes have been mapped in some places. These were done by adding I would be tempted though, if you decide to add (and maintain) the information, to use route relations with the tag answered 23 Dec '13, 09:21 EdLoach ♦ Thanks @edloach. The gritting routes and waste collection has fairly similarity. This solution is non-invasive, as you say, it would suffice define the prefixes of the tags for the ways and use the tags for waste containers (or similar tags). In the "gritting_operator" tag, I see again (the controversy)... use prefix tag + "_operator" or ":operator" ¿? :(
(23 Dec '13, 11:45)
5m4u9
|
No, there seems to be currently no schema for tagging this routes. Of course you are welcome to be the first and describe this new feature :) But IMHO you should always ask, if it makes sense to add a new feature to OSM. I'm not sure if this informations are in a wide interest and if we have enough people that like to keep them up to date. At least in my city we have a mixed system of static routes that get altered if people report extra garbage collections. So here it would IMHO make no sense :( I think there was already a discussion about the schedules for Public transport with the result, that it's not pure geodata and thus should not be modeled within OSM. Steve Coast himself wanted to start a project about collecting it externally and make them machine readable. answered 23 Dec '13, 07:27 iii Thanks @¡¡¡. As you say, the persons concerned will be very few... eg waste collection companies. Reading on the mailing list "talk-transit", I understood the problem of schedules and GTFS format. Apparently, Steve's "transiki" project are stopped. :(
(23 Dec '13, 12:27)
5m4u9
|