What licences are allowed for my own tiles when the database is ODbL now? For example, map1.eu has tiles under CC-BY-NC-ND. Is the NC-ND not against ODbL's copyleft requirements?

asked 05 May '13, 11:17

Kozuch's gravatar image

accept rate: 8%

edited 05 May '13, 11:20

Map tiles are a "produced work". You can release them using any license you like.

The viral part of the ODbL only kicks in when you create a "derived work". E.g. when you combine OSM data with another dataset into a new "database".

Try plugging "ODbL produced derived" into your search engine of choice and you will find many lengthy explanations/discussions.

permanent link

answered 05 May '13, 16:40

cartinus's gravatar image

accept rate: 27%


Sorry but the answer is not quite correct, you can release a "produced work" under any licence as long as clause 4.3 of the ODbL is adhered too which essentially boils down to a attribution requirement.

See http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/

(06 May '13, 11:42) SimonPoole ♦
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 05 May '13, 11:17

question was seen: 2,573 times

last updated: 06 May '13, 11:42

powered by OSQA