broad_leaved vs broad_leafed vs broad-leaved

The wiki page of natural=tree says that it may be used in combination with type=broad_leaved.
The example section, of the same page, uses type=broad_leafed instead.
There is also a wiki page of wood=broad-leaved.
KeepRight reports 'This node is tagged 'type=broad_leaved' where "broad_leaved" looks like "broad_leafed"'

What is the preferred way to tag a broad-leaved tree?

asked 02 Jun '12, 17:42

gnurk
6.1k●10●60●96
accept rate: 15%

One Answer:

active answers oldest answers newest answers popular answers

In case of confusion in the documentation look at the usage in the database at taginfo. It currently reports most uses of type=broad_leafed. However I see a discussion on the wiki about a previous typo that concludes that it should be type=broad_leaved. I assume that that is the correct way to tag it.

permanent link

answered 02 Jun '12, 18:37

Gnonthgol ♦
13.8k●16●103●198
accept rate: 16%

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

*italic* or _italic_
**bold** or __bold__
link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
basic HTML tags are also supported

learn more about Markdown

Question tags:

broad-leaf ×1
broadleaf ×1
broad_leafed ×1
broad-leaved ×1
broad_leaved ×1

question asked: 02 Jun '12, 17:42

question was seen: 2,441 times

last updated: 02 Jun '12, 18:37

broad_leaved vs broad_leafed vs broad-leaved

Follow this question

Related questions