Hello, Should I map sidewalks? If yes - how? Using highway=footway? Pros: adding valuable data for pedestrian routing Cons: adding very large amount of data to OSM, every street usually have 2 sidewalks (on each side), greatly increasing increasing number of junctions (between streets and sidewalks). The rendered tiles could look messy and overcrowded. If there is a place with tagged sidewalks, could you provide a link to it so I could see how it is done? asked 20 Oct '10, 06:34 ivanatora |
Honest answer: No. No you should not map sidewalks. But it is an interesting question. There's no limit to the amount of detail you can add to openstreetmap. You could add a millions of nodes in the park with We had a discussion about this kind of thing over on Tom Chance's blog recently. Sidewalks ('pavements') were an example I gave of a silly level of detail which we have (almost) all decided not to map. answered 21 Oct '10, 16:09 Harry Wood 9
This clearly isn't the right answer to accept when it's so far in the negative.
(09 Aug '11, 23:41)
Baloo Uriza
1
I think what Harry Wood means is that the sidewalks are attributes of the road, not separate mapable objects. Thus when you map a road the number of sidewalks and side(s) of the road that they are on are represented as tags as part of the road, not as separate footpath(s) parallel with the road.
(07 Jun '15, 14:17)
Huttite
|
There was a discussion about this on talk-au earlier this year.
Good discussion!