|
As more information comes in, one more and more comes across cases where the same information has been either spread over several different data points (e.g. a church building is mapped, and a separate node bears the I have been removing such duplication with extreme prejudice whenever I run across it, but I'm vaguely wondering if it is a sound approach. Any thoughts? |
|
This wiki page suggests that what you are doing, based on the description in your question, is correct. 1
If I trace a building that previously was just a node I copy the info over to the building then delete the node. If I trace a suburb I think its important to delete the name node otherwise the name seems to appear outside the suburb in the nominatim
(01 Apr '12, 00:02)
andy mackey
|
