As more information comes in, one more and more comes across cases where the same information has been either spread over several different data points (e.g. a church building is mapped, and a separate node bears the amenity and name tags). I have in fact come across several cases where the same, or some information is spread over three pieces of data: an area, a building, and a node (usually bearing all the same name, but an area and node bearing duplicate amenity tags is also common).

I have been removing such duplication with extreme prejudice whenever I run across it, but I'm vaguely wondering if it is a sound approach. Any thoughts?

asked 31 Mar '12, 17:58

Circeus's gravatar image

accept rate: 7%

edited 31 Mar '12, 17:58

This wiki page suggests that what you are doing, based on the description in your question, is correct.

permanent link

answered 31 Mar '12, 19:47

EdLoach's gravatar image

EdLoach ♦
accept rate: 22%


If I trace a building that previously was just a node I copy the info over to the building then delete the node. If I trace a suburb I think its important to delete the name node otherwise the name seems to appear outside the suburb in the nominatim

(01 Apr '12, 00:02) andy mackey
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 31 Mar '12, 17:58

question was seen: 2,842 times

last updated: 01 Apr '12, 00:02

powered by OSQA