Please forgive my ignorance. I've come across a fair number of tags that are ambiguous or seemingly incorrect. Is there a place to flag these issues so that someone in that area can clarify or correct the data?

asked 12 Oct '10, 17:20

EasyStreet's gravatar image

EasyStreet
6111
accept rate: 0%


OpenStreetBugs or you might want to fix them yourself.

permanent link

answered 12 Oct '10, 17:51

Gnonthgol's gravatar image

Gnonthgol ♦
13.6k15101198
accept rate: 16%

Thanks. That's what I was looking for. I wouldn't presume to know the correct values for tags like "highway=fo]".

(12 Oct '10, 18:20) EasyStreet

highway=fo] might be highway=footway but it would require a resurvey to confirm.

(12 Oct '10, 19:56) Gnonthgol ♦

Where's the most appropriate place to ask about undocumented tags? Does it make sense to report them in OpenStreetBugs?

(12 Oct '10, 20:15) EasyStreet

There are specialized tools like the OSM Inspector that find and flag problems like this. So you don't need to add them to OpenStreetBugs. See for instance: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways&lon=9.00586&lat=50.34125&zoom=8&overlays=type_unknown

(14 Oct '10, 13:43) Jochen Topf
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×5
×2

question asked: 12 Oct '10, 17:20

question was seen: 2,453 times

last updated: 14 Oct '10, 13:43

powered by OSQA