NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is no longer in use from 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum

Why is double licensing with CC-BY-SA still neccessary?

asked 09 Oct '10, 20:31

Kozuch's gravatar image

Kozuch
1.7k587285
accept rate: 8%


The planned license change timeline is described on the Wiki.

No user will ever have the choice to contribute under ODbL exclusively. Everyone who agrees to the new Contributor Terms will permit OSMF to distribute the data under ODbL as well as CC-BY-SA 2.0. (The Contributor terms also contain a clause that will allow further relicensing under other free and open licenses, provided that certain conditions are met.)

OSMF plans to eventually stop distributing the data under CC-BY-SA 2.0 but this will only happen after a significant portion of contributions have been made available for ODbL licensing. If there was an option for you to contribute ODbL-only, your data could not be included in the planet file or otherwise mixed with existing CC-BY-SA 2.0 data.

permanent link

answered 09 Oct '10, 21:21

Frederik%20Ramm's gravatar image

Frederik Ramm ♦
82.5k927201273
accept rate: 23%

edited 11 Oct '10, 08:55

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×33
×31

question asked: 09 Oct '10, 20:31

question was seen: 8,526 times

last updated: 11 Oct '10, 10:19

NOTICE: help.openstreetmap.org is no longer in use from 1st March 2024. Please use the OpenStreetMap Community Forum