Why is double licensing with CC-BY-SA still neccessary?

asked 09 Oct '10, 20:31

Kozuch's gravatar image

Kozuch
1.6k567282
accept rate: 8%


The planned license change timeline is described on the Wiki.

No user will ever have the choice to contribute under ODbL exclusively. Everyone who agrees to the new Contributor Terms will permit OSMF to distribute the data under ODbL as well as CC-BY-SA 2.0. (The Contributor terms also contain a clause that will allow further relicensing under other free and open licenses, provided that certain conditions are met.)

OSMF plans to eventually stop distributing the data under CC-BY-SA 2.0 but this will only happen after a significant portion of contributions have been made available for ODbL licensing. If there was an option for you to contribute ODbL-only, your data could not be included in the planet file or otherwise mixed with existing CC-BY-SA 2.0 data.

permanent link

answered 09 Oct '10, 21:21

Frederik%20Ramm's gravatar image

Frederik Ramm ♦
70.9k836431106
accept rate: 24%

edited 11 Oct '10, 08:55

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×30
×29

question asked: 09 Oct '10, 20:31

question was seen: 7,046 times

last updated: 11 Oct '10, 10:19

powered by OSQA