Why not ask your question on the new OpenStreetMap Community Forum?

Zählen Parkplätze von Geschäften und Supermärkten zu normalen Parkplätzen oder gehören diese in eine andere Kategorie? Danke!

English Version:

Count parking spaces of shops and supermarkets to normal parking spaces or are those in another category? Thank you!

asked 19 Feb '12, 17:42

Applefreak127's gravatar image

Applefreak127
101339
accept rate: 0%

edited 13 Apr '13, 13:34

aseerel4c26's gravatar image

aseerel4c26 ♦
32.6k18248554


Diese werden genauso als Parkplätze eingetragen, du solltest jedoch zusätzlich zu amenity=parking auch access=permissive setzen (es gibt auch access=customer, aber darüber ist man sich noch nicht ganz einig).

permanent link

answered 19 Feb '12, 18:34

scai's gravatar image

scai ♦
33.3k21308459
accept rate: 23%

access=permissive ist im Allgemeinen nicht korrekt: Ein Kundenparkplatz ist normalerweise gerade nicht "open to general traffic" (wie in der Definition von permissive gefordert), sondern darf nur von Kunden genutzt werden.

Einfach amenity=parking + access=customer verwenden. Das Tag ist zwar neu, aber alle vorhandenen passen einfach nicht wirklich auf diese Situation.

(20 Feb '12, 14:24) Tordanik

Why can't you simply do a -1 to comments?

I disagree with @Tordanik and agree with the initial answer. access=permissive is exactly what everyone was told to use for a pub parking when I joined OSM in 2007. Please stop endlessly redefining tags.

(13 Apr '13, 16:07) cartinus

@cartinus: It is true there is some discussion about the access=customer tagging, but access=permissive is definitely wrong, as explained by Tordanik. The alternatives usually proposed for access=customer are access=destination or access=customers; see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/customer and its talk page.

(15 Apr '13, 22:41) sleske

Also note that access=customers (note the 's') is recommended, not access=customer. It's also used much more frequently in OSM.

(15 Apr '13, 22:49) sleske

And I reiterate: access=permissive is and has been the right way for years.

Then five people on a mailinglist or in a wiki proposal page "decide" differently. That is the best way to make tags in OSM useless. Please stop catering to such nonsense.

access=destination on a parking lot is just stupid. The parking lot is always the destination, when you park a car there, so that tag adds absolutely nothing.

(15 Apr '13, 22:52) cartinus
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×286
×71
×2
×1
×1

question asked: 19 Feb '12, 17:42

question was seen: 4,872 times

last updated: 15 Apr '13, 22:52

powered by OSQA