This is a static archive of our old OpenStreetMap Help Site. Please post any new questions and answers at community.osm.org.

CT/ODBL compatibility after edits of non-accepters have been removed

0

Oh, dear, and now I have another question! (well, several, actually!)

Consider this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4852821/history

It shows up in Potlatch as having licence problems, but is a clear example of the situation I've just highlighted, where it was created by an accepter, and has been edited by a couple of decliners as well as accepters. Recently, however, a user called woodpeck_fixbot has removed the edits made by the decliners.

  • is the way OK now?
  • why does it still show with licence problems in potlatch?
  • is this how we can manually revert problems on a way?

asked 20 Jan '12, 11:20

woowoowoo's gravatar image

woowoowoo
1906714
accept rate: 0%

converted to question 20 Jan '12, 11:50

LM_1's gravatar image

LM_1
3.3k335188

1

It's been discussed on talk-au - have a look at the thread around this message:

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2012-January/006855.html

(20 Jan '12, 11:28) SomeoneElse ♦

Source code available on GitHub .