CT/ODBL compatibility after edits of non-accepters have been removed

Oh, dear, and now I have another question! (well, several, actually!)

Consider this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4852821/history

It shows up in Potlatch as having licence problems, but is a clear example of the situation I've just highlighted, where it was created by an accepter, and has been edited by a couple of decliners as well as accepters. Recently, however, a user called woodpeck_fixbot has removed the edits made by the decliners.

is the way OK now?
why does it still show with licence problems in potlatch?
is this how we can manually revert problems on a way?

licence-change

asked 20 Jan '12, 11:20

woowoowoo
190●6●7●14
accept rate: 0%

converted to question 20 Jan '12, 11:50

LM_1
3.3k●33●51●88

It's been discussed on talk-au - have a look at the thread around this message:

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2012-January/006855.html

(20 Jan '12, 11:28) SomeoneElse ♦

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

*italic* or _italic_
**bold** or __bold__
link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
basic HTML tags are also supported

learn more about Markdown

Question tags:

licence-change ×7

question asked: 20 Jan '12, 11:20

question was seen: 1,759 times

last updated: 20 Jan '12, 11:50

CT/ODBL compatibility after edits of non-accepters have been removed

Follow this question

Related questions