Oh, dear, and now I have another question! (well, several, actually!)

Consider this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4852821/history

It shows up in Potlatch as having licence problems, but is a clear example of the situation I've just highlighted, where it was created by an accepter, and has been edited by a couple of decliners as well as accepters. Recently, however, a user called woodpeck_fixbot has removed the edits made by the decliners.

  • is the way OK now?
  • why does it still show with licence problems in potlatch?
  • is this how we can manually revert problems on a way?

asked 20 Jan '12, 11:20

woowoowoo's gravatar image

woowoowoo
1955612
accept rate: 0%

converted to question 20 Jan '12, 11:50

LM_1's gravatar image

LM_1
3.2k334988

1

It's been discussed on talk-au - have a look at the thread around this message:

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2012-January/006855.html

(20 Jan '12, 11:28) SomeoneElse ♦
Be the first one to answer this question!
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×7

question asked: 20 Jan '12, 11:20

question was seen: 1,334 times

last updated: 20 Jan '12, 11:50

powered by OSQA