I've never quite understood the way in which signal-controlled pedestrian crossings (in the UK pelicans, toucans etc.) are tagged. This is fine when I'm using JOSM as there are pre-sets, but when I'm using Potlatch I find the exact convention used in JOSM difficult to remember. So to start with I'm never sure whether to use At road junctions when the traffic signals control vehicular traffic as well as the pedestrian crossing I get more confused. For a simple junction (two streets crossing) I could leave a I would like:
asked 27 May '11, 10:52 SK53 ♦ |
Fairly easy. highway=crossing and crossing=traffic_signals is used for a traffic signal which could be replaced in function from a zebra. highway=traffic_signals and crossing=traffic_signals is used when its a normal junction Where a pedestrian traffic signals makes a crossing possible. answered 04 Nov '11, 12:36 Bürste |
answered 06 Jun '11, 19:25 c2r 1
sorry SK53 if you don't like the page, but it seems to me to clearly state that it should be highway=crossing; crossing=traffic_signals; foot=yes for the case where there is a signal controlled junction with foot crossing facilities... so I'm unsure what the issue is - perhaps you could clarify with a couple of clear examples?
(06 Jun '11, 20:49)
c2r
2
I down voted your answer because it did NOT answer the question. The wiki page & the answer I linked to are fine as far as they go. I would like a little more detail and some background. I'm sure that if I find it difficult to remember the tagging after a couple of years its probably not instinctive for others. I asked the question to encourage elaboration of what has already been said, in the hope that this would be useful to any contributor.
(10 Jun '11, 13:25)
SK53 ♦
|
I've also found this a bit confusing, and would love for some more examples and clearer explanations to be added to the wiki, on how advanced pedestrian crossings should be tagged. So once you have received a good answer here, maybe relevant pages in the wiki could be updated based on it?